Re: [PATCH] cryptoloop

From: Christoph Hellwig (hch@infradead.org)
Date: Fri Jul 04 2003 - 08:28:18 EST


On Fri, Jul 04, 2003 at 03:21:15PM +0200, Andries.Brouwer@cwi.nl wrote:
> BTW - So far, Clemens and Jari and I have been cooperating and
> discussing every step. Most of your statements seem unfounded to me.

I'd be happy to take everything back :) But so far I've only heard
him moaning that

  a) the cryptoloop implementation you submitted is the worst possible
     one (without any backing)
  b) the changes proposed by akpm and me would break external modules
     (which they would, but that's life and we've never cared much
     about outside drivers) und would make them slower which is
     utterly bogus.

But hey, let's give him time to defend himself..

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Mon Jul 07 2003 - 22:00:23 EST