Re: [RFC] parallel directory operations

From: bzzz@tmi.comex.ru
Date: Tue Jul 08 2003 - 10:50:27 EST


>>>>> Andi Kleen (AK) writes:

 AK> On Tue, 08 Jul 2003 15:28:27 +0000
 AK> bzzz@tmi.comex.ru wrote:

>> dynlocks implements 'lock namespace', so you can lock A for namepace N1 and
>> lock B for namespace N1 and so on. we need this because we want to take lock
>> on _part_ of directory.

 AK> Ok, a mini database lock manager. Wouldn't it be better to use a small hash
 AK> table and lock escalation on overflow for this? Otherwise you could
 AK> have quite a lot of entries queued up in the list if the server is slow.

well, it makes sense. AFAIU, only problem with this solution is that we need
very well-tuned hash function. BTW, dynlocks are taken for operation time only.
so, in most often case, for dir entry creation/lookup we need two locks: one for
dcache locking and another for htree's leaf locking.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:27 EST