--On Tuesday, July 08, 2003 06:20:28 PM +0100 Matthew Wilcox <willy@debian.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 08, 2003 at 07:06:28PM +0200, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>> every change (if it's not a bugfix, and even those) bear
>> a risk, what I like about the fastwalk patch is not the
>
> exactly. 2.4 is not the place for cleanups that make the code easier
> to read because those cleanups can introduce new bugs.
>
Im not going to fight too hard for this. If people want it removed
that is OK. I pushed it because dcache_rcu was not going to be
accepted and Fastwalk is a fair second to dcache_rcu. The change Trond
pointed out was added by Al Viro after fastwalk was included in 2.5.11
which I backported.
Hanna
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:28 EST