Re: [PATCH - RFC] [1/2] 2.6 must-fix list - kernel error reporting

From: Andrew Morton (akpm@osdl.org)
Date: Tue Jul 08 2003 - 12:59:12 EST


Jim Keniston <jkenisto@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> The enclosed patches provide a mechanism for reporting error events
> to user-mode applications via netlink.

Seems sane to me.

It needs to handle %z as well as %Z.

The layout of `struct kern_log_entry' may be problematic. Think of the
situation where a 64-bit kernel constructs one of these and sends it up to
32-bit userspace. Will the structure layout be the same under the 32-bit
compiler as under the 64-bit one?

How do you actually intend to use this? Will it be by adding new
evt_printf() calls to particular drivers, or replacing existing printk's or
both?

Would it make sense for evt_printf() to fall back to printk() if nobody is
listening to the log stream?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:28 EST