printk in atomic context

From: Andrey Borzenkov (arvidjaar@mail.ru)
Date: Wed Jul 09 2003 - 01:18:34 EST

Next message: Terje Kvernes: "2.5.74 - sbp2 fails to compile, missing include of <linux/pci.h>?"
Previous message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: undefined reference to `xapic_support`"
Next in thread: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Re: printk in atomic context"
Reply: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Re: printk in atomic context"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Is it possible (safe) to use printk in atomic context, i.e. under
spinlock or inside of preemption-disabled region?

The same question about 2.4 (here I guess only spinlock?)

TIA

-andrey
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Terje Kvernes: "2.5.74 - sbp2 fails to compile, missing include of <linux/pci.h>?"
Previous message: Martin J. Bligh: "Re: undefined reference to `xapic_support`"
Next in thread: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Re: printk in atomic context"
Reply: Zwane Mwaikambo: "Re: printk in atomic context"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:30 EST