On Wed, 9 Jul 2003, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> On Wednesday 09 July 2003 20:08, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> Hi Marcelo,
>
> > Ok, right. Well, I dont know why it doesnt happen there. Maybe not enough
> > testing?
> aehm, I'll bet -aa is tested _alot_ and also -wolk has tons of testers, but
> well, this is a different talk ;)
>
> > Anyway, I'm going to revert the NFS DIRECT IO patch because, as Christoph
> > mentioned, breaks the API.
> > I except another solution from Trond (maybe ->direct_IO2).
> I wonder why you merge such stuff then in the first place, if you agree with
> hch's opinion, that an API should not change in stable kernel series in the
> 2nd place? ... Did you temporarly forget it? ;)
No, I did not.
I applied it because, in my ignorance, I did not noticed it would break
the stable API.
I applied it because I wanted comments useful from people (Like hch and
others did).
Thank you very much for your flaming.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:32 EST