Re: Fix IDE initialization when we don't probe for interrupts.

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@pobox.com)
Date: Wed Jul 09 2003 - 17:52:35 EST

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.22 Give us today our daily wart..."
Previous message: Alex Romosan: "Re: Linux 2.4.22-pre4"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Fix IDE initialization when we don't probe for interrupts."
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Fix IDE initialization when we don't probe for interrupts."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

Linus Torvalds wrote:

Thanks.

> (Obviously it must be zero for some architecture, though, or those
> conditionals woulnd't make sense. Alan? Bartlomiej? What kind of sick
> pseudo-IDE controller doesn't have a control register?).

I asked Andre or Russell King or somebody this a while ago... IIRC it is
some obscure ATARI IDE controller, or somesuch.

Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Jeff Garzik: "Re: [PATCH] 2.4.22 Give us today our daily wart..."
Previous message: Alex Romosan: "Re: Linux 2.4.22-pre4"
In reply to: Linus Torvalds: "Re: Fix IDE initialization when we don't probe for interrupts."
Next in thread: Alan Cox: "Re: Fix IDE initialization when we don't probe for interrupts."
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:32 EST