On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 10:44:50PM -0700, Piet Delaney wrote:
>> I'll settle for Matt Mackall <mpm@selenic.com> fix for now:
>> +#define apm_save_cpus() (current->cpus_allowed)
>> I wonder why other, like Thomas Schlichter <schlicht@uni-mannheim.de>,
>> had no problem with the CPU_MASK_NONE fix.
>> I tried adding the #include <linux/cpumask.h> that Marc-Christian
>> Petersen <m.c.p@wolk-project.de> sugested but it didn't help. Looks
>> like Jan De Luyck <lkml@kcore.org> had a similar result.
On Wed, Jul 09, 2003 at 11:08:41PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> Ugh. Fixing.
diff -prauN mm3-2.5.74-1/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c mm3-2.5.74-apm-1/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c
--- mm3-2.5.74-1/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c 2003-07-09 00:03:25.000000000 -0700
+++ mm3-2.5.74-apm-1/arch/i386/kernel/apm.c 2003-07-10 00:03:31.000000000 -0700
@@ -528,7 +528,7 @@ static inline void apm_restore_cpus(cpum
* No CPU lockdown needed on a uniprocessor
*/
-#define apm_save_cpus() 0
+#define apm_save_cpus() ({ cpumask_t __mask__ = CPU_MASK_NONE; __mask__; })
#define apm_restore_cpus(x) (void)(x)
#endif
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:34 EST