On Thursday 10 July 2003 11:27, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2003 at 11:22:56AM +0200, Thomas Schlichter wrote:
> > Well, I didn't try the CPU_MASK_NONE fix. I am using my fix attached to
> > my first mail, but Andrew ment it was too complex (your quoting from
> > above). So he proposed the simpler fix, wich simply looked good to me...
>
> Could you try the following?
OK, I tried it. For me it compiles!
But the size of the resulting objectfile's text section is about 64bytes
larger than with my patch. So it seems that gcc3.3 wasn't able to optimize
away all the unneeded stuff...
And I don't think my patch is that ugly, but hey, it's your decision...
Best regards
Thomas Schlichter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:34 EST