>>>>> Andrew Morton (AM) writes:
AM> Alex Tomas <bzzz@tmi.comex.ru> wrote:
>>
>> OK. fixed version:
AM> Looks nice. Now, Andreas did mention a while back that the locking rework
AM> added an additional complexity to this optimization. Perhaps he can remind
AM> us of the details there?
he meant than 2.5 don't use lock_sb() for inode allocation. this patch is safe
from this point of view.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:36 EST