* Marcelo Tosatti (marcelo@conectiva.com.br) wrote:
> +int single_open(struct file *file, int (*show)(struct seq_file *, void*), void *data)
> +{
> + struct seq_operations *op = kmalloc(sizeof(*op), GFP_KERNEL);
> + int res = -ENOMEM;
> +
> + if (op) {
> + op->start = single_start;
> + op->next = single_next;
> + op->stop = single_stop;
> + op->show = show;
> + res = seq_open(file, op);
Any reason not to simply allocate static ops struct? As in:
static struct seq_operations single_ops = {
.start = single_start;
.next = single_next;
.stop = single_stop;
.show = show;
};
int single_open()
{
req = seq_open(file, &single_ops);
...
}
thanks,
-chris
-- Linux Security Modules http://lsm.immunix.org http://lsm.bkbits.net - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:36 EST