On Fri, 11 Jul 2003, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / [iso-2022-jp] $B5HF#1QL@(B wrote:
> In article <Pine.LNX.4.44.0307110821110.24981-100000@netcore.fi> (at Fri, 11 Jul 2003 08:22:39 +0300 (EEST)), Pekka Savola <pekkas@netcore.fi> says:
>
> > (It might be nice to have configurable /proc option on whether to enable
> > the subnet router anycast address at all, but that's also a different
> > story..)
>
> I don't like this
> while I would be ok to have configuration option
> not to support anycast.
With "not to support anycast" you probably meant "not to support
subnet-router anycast address [automatically, in the kernel, as now]" ?
These are entirely different things.
(Note that if there's a user-level API for setting anycast addresses, one
could kick the subnet-router anycast address out of the kernel too.
Whether that's desirable is another thing.)
-- Pekka Savola "You each name yourselves king, yet the Netcore Oy kingdom bleeds." Systems. Networks. Security. -- George R.R. Martin: A Clash of Kings- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:38 EST