Andrew Morton writes:
> Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > If
> > there are filesystems which store the sub-seconds on disk I think this
> > is necessary since otherwise all kinds of programs (including archives)
> > cannot be written correctly. If the sub-seconds only live in memory I
> > still think it would be good to have the syscalls but it would not be
> > that urgent.
>
> XFS (at least) stores nanoseconds on disk. So yes, I think we should make
> this change.
so does reiser4.
> -
Nikita.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:50 EST