On Mon, 14 Jul 2003, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> Yes, and it worked fine. No cpu load I tossed at it caused a skip.
I tried yesterday a thud.c load and it did not get a single skip here
either. It is interesting what thud.c can do to latency (let's not talk
about irman because things get really nasty). With a simple `thud 5` the
latency rised to more then one full second, as you can see by the graphs
inside the SOFTRR page. No buffer size can cope with that.
- Davide
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 22:00:53 EST