On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 07:41:55AM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> Oh, well that won't fly; it effectively isn't a constant initializer.
>> I'll see what can be rammed past gcc. We're shooting for something
>> with array element 0 equal to 0x1UL and all others 0.
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 08:02:07AM -0700, Barry K. Nathan wrote:
> BTW, following my e-mail signature in this message is my .config. I
> guess the most notable setting is that CONFIG_SMP is disabled (i.e.,
> it's a UP compile).
Hmm. Well, ditching the strong typechecking would "fix" it, though
that's really only papering over it.
Okay, enough jabbering for me...
-- wli
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 22:00:25 EST