Re: 2.6.0-test1-mm1: bad: scheduling while atomic! after removing ohci1394 module

From: Ben Collins (bcollins@debian.org)
Date: Wed Jul 16 2003 - 11:53:40 EST

Next message: Pedro Ribeiro: "Problems with 2.6.0-test1 && depmod"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: 2.6.0-test1-mm1"
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: 2.6.0-test1-mm1: bad: scheduling while atomic! after removing ohci1394 module"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:45:06PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:36:48PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
> > So is kill_proc() bad while atomic, e.g. when a module is being removed?
> > I'll look into it.
>
> hmmm, that's a big strange. During ->remove and module unload, you can
> schedule and sleep.

I'd have to check to make sure the remove callbacks are doing something
stupid in the ieee1394 subsystem, like causing this problem.

-- 
Debian     - http://www.debian.org/
Linux 1394 - http://www.linux1394.org/
Subversion - http://subversion.tigris.org/
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Pedro Ribeiro: "Problems with 2.6.0-test1 && depmod"
Previous message: Andrew Morton: "Re: 2.6.0-test1-mm1"
In reply to: Jeff Garzik: "Re: 2.6.0-test1-mm1: bad: scheduling while atomic! after removing ohci1394 module"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 22:00:25 EST