Re: devfsd

From: Michael Buesch (fsdeveloper@yahoo.de)
Date: Thu Jul 17 2003 - 11:38:59 EST


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Thursday 17 July 2003 17:56, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2003 at 04:46:10PM -0500, Ro0tSiEgE LKML wrote:
> > Why is devfsd still tagged as EXPERIMENTAL even in 2.6.0-test1 ? Is
> > there something wrong with it, or has it just not been changed?
>
> It's still there because we don't have a BROKEN tag.

Hm, should we introduce a BROKEN tag? (I'm not kidding. :) )
Because in a development tree, many things are known broken
and with this tag we may reduce the same bug-reports on
this list over and over again.

- --
Regards Michael Buesch
http://www.8ung.at/tuxsoft
Penguin on this machine: Linux 2.4.21 - i386

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQE/FtEuoxoigfggmSgRAvvxAJ4oeM9wSBYh9zSMESK90bFR+JfLXgCfWiDU
BZdHfen1MsXcNv6OicXSr9w=
=wrz0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 22:00:29 EST