Re: 2.6.0-test1: Framebuffer problem

From: Alan Cox (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Date: Fri Jul 18 2003 - 07:57:05 EST

Next message: James Bourne: "[BUG REPORT 2.6.0] cisco airo_cs scheduling while atomic"
Previous message: Olaf Dietsche: "Re: run-parts,find, kupdated: What are they and how to control them?"
In reply to: James Simmons: "Re: 2.6.0-test1: Framebuffer problem"
Next in thread: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: 2.6.0-test1: Framebuffer problem"
Reply: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: 2.6.0-test1: Framebuffer problem"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Iau, 2003-07-17 at 18:34, James Simmons wrote:
> > > > > CONFIG_FB_VGA16=y <---- to many drivers selected. Please
> > > <---- pick only one.
> > > > > CONFIG_FB_VESA=y
> >
> > This is a completely sensible selection and works as expected in 2.4 so
> > it really wants fixing anyway
>
> It is if you have more than one graphics card. If you only have one card
> then you will have problems.

Then it still needs to be fixed. This works correctly in 2.4

-- 
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: James Bourne: "[BUG REPORT 2.6.0] cisco airo_cs scheduling while atomic"
Previous message: Olaf Dietsche: "Re: run-parts,find, kupdated: What are they and how to control them?"
In reply to: James Simmons: "Re: 2.6.0-test1: Framebuffer problem"
Next in thread: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: 2.6.0-test1: Framebuffer problem"
Reply: Geert Uytterhoeven: "Re: 2.6.0-test1: Framebuffer problem"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 22:00:33 EST