Hi all,
I have a little question...
Summary of changes from v2.4.21-pre4 to v2.4.21-pre5
============================================
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>:
o ACPI apparently wasnt bios
o fix wrong date in microcode comment
o add another legitimate P4 type
o must disallow write combine on 450NX
o add framework for ndelay (nanoseconds)
o first block of parisc resend
o second block of parisc merge
o third block of parisc merge
o Ian Nelson moved
o update videobook docs to avoid check_region
o docs for IPMI
o remove dead init call
o add AMD hammer rng
o IPMI driver updates
o keyboard changes
o fix wrong test in raw driver
o fix paths for ide
o clarify hpt37x config
o fix more ide paths
o Paul's fix to do ide_cs handling in task context
o more ide paths
o fix use of check_region in umc driver
o more ide comment/doc info updates
o promise printk cleanups
o another wrong path
o IDE printk/cleanup bits
o fix padding on eepro driver
In this patch, is it possible that there is a problem in the fix of
eepro driver? Since I upgrade the kernel with 2.4.20-8 (kernel-source
tag in debian) which include this patch I have some problem with packets
which are sometimes truncated... (the server runs an ircd and the result
is a delink).
Jul 17 06:31:00 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state !=
TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
Jul 17 06:31:00 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion
((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
t af_inet.c(689)
Jul 17 18:27:53 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state !=
TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
Jul 17 18:27:53 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion
((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
t af_inet.c(689)
Jul 17 20:52:35 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state !=
TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
Jul 17 20:52:35 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion
((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
t af_inet.c(689)
Jul 17 21:52:16 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state !=
TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
Jul 17 21:52:16 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion
((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
t af_inet.c(689)
Jul 17 22:49:31 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (newsk->state !=
TCP_SYN_RECV) failed at tcp.c(2229)
Jul 17 22:49:31 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion
((1<<sk2->state)&(TCPF_ESTABLISHED|TCPF_CLOSE_WAIT|TCPF_CLOSE)) failed a
t af_inet.c(689)
OR
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
at tcp.c(1545)
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
at tcp.c(1545)
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
at tcp.c(1545)
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
at tcp.c(1545)
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
at tcp.c(1545)
Jul 12 21:33:58 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
Jul 12 21:33:59 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
at tcp.c(1545)
Jul 12 21:33:59 fazer kernel: recvmsg bug: copied DDDA9120 seq DDDA91E9
Jul 12 21:33:59 fazer kernel: KERNEL: assertion (flags&MSG_PEEK) failed
at tcp.c(1545)
If I do a rollback, no more problems... I don't test yet a 2.4.21 kernel.
Hardware is a Dell PowerAppWeb 120A with one CPU P3 1 GHz / 256 Mo RAM /
Now Kernel is generated under debian with kernel-source-2.4.20-2 and gcc
version 2.95.4 20011002.
Any idea? (Thanks for your help)
-- Cedric Gavage <cedric.gavage@unixtech.be> http://unixtech.be - http://gavage.com - OpenPGP: 0xED325C64- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 22:00:37 EST