James Morris <jmorris@intercode.com.au> writes:
> On Sat, 19 Jul 2003, Sean Neakums wrote:
>
>> twenty. The problem seems unrelated to the amount of data
>> transferred; I've tried both bulk rsync transfers and ssh sessions.
>> I've also tested the same boxes over 100baseT; still happens.
>
> It sounds a bit like a pmtu problem related to the wireless bridge, but
> that would be dependent on amount of data transferred and should not
> happen on 100baseT.
I am seeing a lot of "pmtu discvovery on SA AH/03537192/c0a80003" type
messages (I forgot to check for them when on 100baseT; will recheck
that). Are these indicative of such a problem? I seem to recall that
reducing the max MTU is not as straightforward as just adjusting the
interfaces' mtu setting. What should I do to eliminate pmtu as the
source of the problem?
> Transport mode (just blowfish encryption) looks to be working ok for me,
> I'm able to ftp uncompressed kernel tarballs between two boxes over
> gigabit ethernet with no apparent problems.
I had been using 3des with AH; just retried with blowfish 448 and no
AH with much the same result.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Wed Jul 23 2003 - 22:00:39 EST