Re: Reiser4 status: benchmarked vs. V3 (and ext3)

From: Hans Reiser (reiser@namesys.com)
Date: Sun Jul 27 2003 - 07:59:40 EST


Daniel Egger wrote:

>Am Fre, 2003-07-25 um 15.02 schrieb Nikita Danilov:
>
>
>
>>No special measures are taken to level block allocation. Wandered blocks
>>are allocated to improve packing i.e., place blocks of the same file
>>close to each other. Actually, it tries to place tree nodes in the
>>parent-first order.
>>
>>
>
>So the new blocks are created as close as possible to the old blocks
>instead of say spreading them as far as possible. This is pretty bad for
>usage in the embedded world but I guess this is not the market you're
>aiming at. :(
>
>
>
I thought that close was fine, it was putting it in the same block that
was the problem?

Again, I think this is best solved in the device layer.

-- 
Hans

- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:32 EST