Re: [TRIVIAL] place IPv4 netfilter submenu where it belongs

From: Tomas Szepe (szepe@pinerecords.com)
Date: Mon Jul 28 2003 - 00:50:15 EST

Next message: Voicu Liviu: "Re: where are the sources :-)"
Previous message: Claas Langbehn: "Re: 2.6.0-test2 has i8042 mux problems"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [TRIVIAL] place IPv4 netfilter submenu where it belongs"
Next in thread: Tomas Szepe: "Re: [TRIVIAL] place IPv4 netfilter submenu where it belongs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

> [davem@redhat.com]
>
> On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 22:06:46 +0200
> Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com> wrote:
>
> > $subj
> >
> > Patch against -bk3.
>
> This doesn't look right at all.
>
> Netfilter is for many protocols other than ipv4 (ipv6, bridging,
> decnet, etc.) so putting it under ipv4 makes not much sense
> to me.

You're right, I'll think about this some more.

-- 
Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Next message: Voicu Liviu: "Re: where are the sources :-)"
Previous message: Claas Langbehn: "Re: 2.6.0-test2 has i8042 mux problems"
In reply to: David S. Miller: "Re: [TRIVIAL] place IPv4 netfilter submenu where it belongs"
Next in thread: Tomas Szepe: "Re: [TRIVIAL] place IPv4 netfilter submenu where it belongs"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:34 EST