On Wed, 30 Jul 2003, Andrea Arcangeli wrote:
> The thing triggered simply by running setitimer in one function, while
> the it_real_fn was running in the other cpu. I don't see how 2.6 can
> have fixed this, it_real_fun can still trivially call add_timer while
> you run inside do_setitimer in 2.6 too. [...]
This is not a race that can happen. itimer does this:
del_timer_sync();
add_timer();
how can the add_timer() still happen while it_real_fn is still running on
another CPU?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Jul 31 2003 - 22:00:44 EST