Re: [PATCH 2.4.22-pre10] SAK: If a process is killed by SAK, give us an info about which one was killed

• Next message: Ian Kumlien: "Re: [SHED][IO-SHED] Are we missing the big picture?"
• Previous message: Calum Mackay: "[PATCH] 2.4: export the symbol "mmu_cr4_features" for XFree86 DRM kernel drivers"
• In reply to: Marc-Christian Petersen: "Re: [PATCH 2.4.22-pre10] SAK: If a process is killed by SAK, give us an info about which one was killed"
• Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: [PATCH 2.4.22-pre10] SAK: If a process is killed by SAK, give us an info about which one was killed"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

On Gwe, 2003-08-01 at 13:26, Marc-Christian Petersen wrote:
> On Friday 01 August 2003 14:09, Alan Cox wrote:
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> > This is potentially private information. It shouldnt be reported
> > I disagree with the patch
> well, it get logged to syslog(3) and dmesg(8). No normal user has access to
> it, no?

It may also end up on the console

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

• Next message: Ian Kumlien: "Re: [SHED][IO-SHED] Are we missing the big picture?"
• Previous message: Calum Mackay: "[PATCH] 2.4: export the symbol "mmu_cr4_features" for XFree86 DRM kernel drivers"
• In reply to: Marc-Christian Petersen: "Re: [PATCH 2.4.22-pre10] SAK: If a process is killed by SAK, give us an info about which one was killed"
• Next in thread: Pavel Machek: "Re: [PATCH 2.4.22-pre10] SAK: If a process is killed by SAK, give us an info about which one was killed"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 22:00:16 EST