bert hubert <ahu@ds9a.nl> wrote:
>
> as one of the 'tastemasters', what are your thoughts on doing this
> dynamically? The sigsegv option might be a dynamic option?
who, me? umm...
I can see that a patch like this would have a place in a general
security-hardened kernel: one which closes off all the means by which root
can alter the running kernel.
But that's a specialised thing which interested parties can maintain as a
standalone patch, and bringing just one part of it into the main kernel
seems rather arbitrary.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 22:00:22 EST