On Tue, 5 Aug 2003 12:21, Nick Piggin wrote:
> No, this still special-cases the uninterruptible sleep. Why is this
> needed? What is being worked around? There is probably a way to
> attack the cause of the problem.
Footnote: I was thinking of using this to also _elevate_ the dynamic priority
of tasks waking from interruptible sleep as well which may help throughput.
Con
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 22:00:27 EST