Re: [TRIVIAL] sanitize power management config menus, take two

From: Tomas Szepe (szepe@pinerecords.com)
Date: Tue Aug 05 2003 - 11:36:48 EST


> [szepe@pinerecords.com]
>
> > [poup@poupinou.org]
> >
> > > o only enable cpufreq options if power management is selected
> > > o don't put cpufreq options in a separate submenu
> >
> > Yes, but what I do not understand is why cpufreq need power management.
>
> Because it is a power management option. :)
>
> CONFIG_PM is a dummy option, it does not link any code into the kernel
> by itself.

Ooops, I ain't right. :)

There actually seems to be code that depends on CONFIG_PM,
particularly so on arches other that x86, so the 'depends
on PM' clause for cpufreq is indeed bogus.

Thanks for pointing this out, I'll post a fixed patch.

-- 
Tomas Szepe <szepe@pinerecords.com>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 22:00:29 EST