Re: [PATCH] revert to static = {0}

From: Jeff Garzik (jgarzik@pobox.com)
Date: Tue Aug 05 2003 - 16:13:00 EST


William Lee Irwin III wrote:
> On Tue, 5 Aug 2003, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
>>>If it's const, it shouldn't be linked into anything at all... right?
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 07:51:41PM +0100, Hugh Dickins wrote:
>
>>Sorry, Jeff, I don't get your point.
>
>
> I suspect this assumes const values will get constant folded, which I'm
> not sure is the case, though it certainly sounds legal and worthwhile
> for a compiler to do when reasonable (i.e. for small structures and/or
> extractions of small fields of const structures).

Correct. In fact, some Linux kernel code _assumes_ the compiler will
fold constants...

        Jeff

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/



This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 22:00:30 EST