> So, finally getting to my question, should I even *expect* a non-NPTL
> kernel to work with the RH9 userland?
Yes, absolutely. It's a design goal of RHL to work with unpatched
kernel.org kernels.
>
> If not, is there a simple fix
> without going to NPTL, say just rebuilding glibc? hmm... now that I
> ask it I feel dumb, I do think I would need to rebuild glibc so it
> knows the kernel has LinuxThreads, not NPTL.
no need. RHL9 ships with BOTH LinuxThreads and NPTL and will switch
dynamically at runtime depending on your kernel capabilities.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b29 : Thu Aug 07 2003 - 22:00:37 EST