Re: Surprising Kconfig depends semantics

[Roman Zippel]

Hi,

On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Adrian Bunk wrote:

> CONFIG_SERIO=m with CONFIG_KEYBOARD_ATKBD=y shouldn't be a valid 
> combination.
> 
> The correct solution is most likely a
> 	default y if INPUT=y && INPUT_KEYBOARD=y && SERIO=y
> 	default m if INPUT!=n && INPUT_KEYBOARD!=n && SERIO!=n

This is probably the easiest solution:

	default INPUT_KEYBOARD && SERIO

(INPUT_KEYBOARD already depends on INPUT)

> The semantics that in
> 
> config FOO
> 	tristate
> 	default y if BAR
> 
> FOO will be set to y if BAR=m is a bit surprising.

Why?

bye, Roman

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/