Re: 2.6: kconfig handling of recursive dependencies could be improved
From: Roman Zippel
Date: Fri Aug 08 2003 - 10:34:50 EST
Hi,
On Fri, 8 Aug 2003, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> I tried to implement a "select at least one of these options" using the
> following Kconfig snippet:
>
> config A
> bool "a"
>
> config B
> bool "b"
>
> config C
> bool
> default y if A=n && B=n
> select A
> select B
This sort of dependency would be better handled with another choice
option, but this is not really 2.6 material.
> Yes, there is a limited recursion, but it's a finite recursion and I
> don't know of any other way to express this in the current kconfig
> language.
It's not really possible. You can show a comment if nothing is selected
and use a reasonable default.
bye, Roman
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/