Re: 2.6.0-test2-mm5: scheduler problem & apic

[Danny ter Haar]

Alistair J Strachan  <alistair@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>Andrew, I don't know if anybody's given you any feedback regarding the nForce 
>2 APIC fix, but it appears to resolve the dead kernel problem, and I no 
>longer have problems with IRQ fallouts when using acpi, and I've removed 
>pci=noacpi from cmdline. ACPI and APIC now work together harmoniously.

I still occasionally see this behaviour:

New kernel install (booting from 2.6.0-test2 (vanilla)):

 EXT3-fs: mounted filesystem with ordered data mode.
 irq 19: nobody cared!
 Call Trace:
  [<c010be0a>] __report_bad_irq+0x32/0x90
  [<c010bee0>] note_interrupt+0x50/0x78
  [<c010c0e0>] do_IRQ+0xc0/0x124
  [<c0108dd0>] default_idle+0x0/0x34
  [<c0107000>] _stext+0x0/0x48
  [<c02819ec>] common_interrupt+0x18/0x20
  [<c0108dd0>] default_idle+0x0/0x34
  [<c0107000>] _stext+0x0/0x48
  [<c0108df9>] default_idle+0x29/0x34
  [<c0108e83>] cpu_idle+0x37/0x48
  [<c0107045>] _stext+0x45/0x48
  [<c032276b>] start_kernel+0x147/0x150
 handlers:
 [<c01f3b34>] (ide_intr+0x0/0x160)
 [<c01f3b34>] (ide_intr+0x0/0x160)
 Disabling IRQ #19
 hde: sata_error = 0x00400000, watchdog = 1, siimage_mmio_ide_dma_test_irq
 hdg: sata_error = 0x00400000, watchdog = 1, siimage_mmio_ide_dma_test_irq

powercycling the machine let the kernel boot without this notice (and normal
working). This is a newsgate machine with HT and sata.

Sounds familiar ?

Danny
-- 
I think so Brain, but why does a forklift 
have to be so big if all it does is lift forks?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/