NULL. Again. (was Re: [PATCH] 2.4.22pre10: {,un}likely_p())

[Chip Salzenberg]

According to Jamie Lokier:
> Not just K&R.  These are different because of varargs:
> 	printf ("%p", NULL);
> 	printf ("%p", 0);

*SIGH*  I thought incorrect folk wisdom about NULL and zero and pointer
conversions had long since died out.  More fool I.  Please, *please*,
_no_one_else_ argue about NULL/zero/false etc. until after reading this:

  ===[[  http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/s5.html  ]]===

I thank you, and linux users everywhere thank you.
-- 
Chip Salzenberg               - a.k.a. -               <chip@xxxxxxxxx>
"I wanted to play hopscotch with the impenetrable mystery of existence,
    but he stepped in a wormhole and had to go in early."  // MST3K
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/