Re: NULL. Again. (was Re: [PATCH] 2.4.22pre10: {,un}likely_p())

[Jamie Lokier]

Chip Salzenberg wrote:
> According to Jamie Lokier:
> > Not just K&R.  These are different because of varargs:
> > 	printf ("%p", NULL);
> > 	printf ("%p", 0);
> 
> *SIGH*  I thought incorrect folk wisdom about NULL and zero and pointer
> conversions had long since died out.  More fool I.  Please, *please*,
> _no_one_else_ argue about NULL/zero/false etc. until after reading this:
> 
>   ===[[  http://www.eskimo.com/~scs/C-faq/s5.html  ]]===

Thanks Chip; I am much enlightened.  That is a fine URL.

To onlookers: neither of those printf statements is portable :)

-- Jamie

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/