Re: [PATCH] loop: fixing cryptoloop troubles.

[Pascal Brisset]

James Morris writes:
 > See RFC 2410, section 2 :-)

This says NULL is the identity function, which is not the same as:

    static void null_encrypt(void *ctx, u8 *dst, const u8 *src)
    { }

In practice this code never gets called because cbc_process() has
a special case for iv==NULL.  But I'd rather see a semantically
correct reference implementation.  Or just leave .cia_encrypt=NULL.

Am I missing something here ?

-- Pascal

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/