Re: [linux-usb-devel] Re: [PATCH] oops in sd_shutdown

[Mike Anderson]

Greg KH [greg@xxxxxxxxx] wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 07:53:53AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 12, 2003 at 12:28:44AM +0200, Andries Brouwer wrote:
> > > I see an Oops in the SCSI code, caused by the fact that sdkp is NULL
> > > in sd_shutdown. "How can that be?", you will ask - dev->driver_data was set
> > > in sd_probe. But in my case sd_probe never finished. An insmod usb-storage
> > > hangs forever, or at least for more than six hours, giving ample opportunity
> > > to observe this race between sd_probe and sd_shutdown.
> > > (Of course sd_probe hangs in sd_revalidate disk.)
> > 
> > Well, this same problem could show upb in any other driver.  Could
> > you instead send a patch to Pat that the driver model never calls
> > the shutdown method for a driver that hasn't finished ->probe?
> 
> I think it already will not do that due to taking the bus->subsys.rwsem
> before calling either probe() or remove().
> 

Is the shutdown being called directly? The shutdown call is protected by
a different rwsem. Depending on the call graph setting dev->driver on
return of probe may provide a solution. I have not looked at all probe
routines to understand if this would cause any bad side effects.

Andries,
	Can you send the oops output?

-andmike
--
Michael Anderson
andmike@xxxxxxxxxx

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/