Re: [PATCH] get rid of bcopy warning

From: Richard B. Johnson
Date: Wed Aug 13 2003 - 14:22:55 EST


On Wed, 13 Aug 2003, Stephen Hemminger wrote:

> Get rid of warning because internal definition of bcopy
> conflicts with builtin. The warning is probably a bogus
> bug of GCC 3.2.3, but the workaround is simple.
>
> Almost no driver really uses bcopy anyway, and no code
> uses the return value.

There should never have been a return value from a function
called bcopy() anyway.

>
> diff -Nru a/lib/string.c b/lib/string.c
> --- a/lib/string.c Wed Aug 13 11:31:13 2003
> +++ b/lib/string.c Wed Aug 13 11:31:13 2003
> @@ -432,14 +432,13 @@
> * You should not use this function to access IO space, use memcpy_toio()
> * or memcpy_fromio() instead.
> */
> -char * bcopy(const char * src, char * dest, int count)
> +void bcopy(const void * src, void * dest, size_t count)
> {
> + const char *s = src;
> char *tmp = dest;
>
> while (count--)
> - *tmp++ = *src++;
> -
> - return dest;
> + *tmp++ = *s++;
> }
> #endif
>

This whole thing is bogus. bcopy() is supposed to handle
copies of overlapping buffers (IEEE Std 1003.1-2001).

This means that if destination is at a greater offset than the
source, the data has to be copied backwards. The code above
is broken.

Cheers,
Dick Johnson
Penguin : Linux version 2.4.20 on an i686 machine (797.90 BogoMips).
Note 96.31% of all statistics are fiction.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/