Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle fixes for drm_agpsupport

From: Eli Carter
Date: Thu Aug 14 2003 - 09:26:08 EST


Larry McVoy wrote:
On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 12:58:44PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:

Larry McVoy wrote:

A few comments on why I don't like this patch:
1) It's a formatting only patch. That screws over people who are using
BK for debugging, now when I double click on these changes I'll get
to your cleanup patch, not the patch that was the last substantive
change.

This is true, but at the same time, in Linux CodingStyle patches culturally acceptable. I think the general logic is just "don't go overboard; reformat a tiny fragment at a time."


That ought to be balanced with "don't screw up the revision history, people
use it". It's one thing to reformat code that is unreadable, for the most
part this code didn't come close to unreadable.

Devil's advocate:
Then perhaps the (revision control) tool is getting in the way of doing the job and should be fixed? :)
Perhaps being able to flag a changeset as a 'formatting change', and have the option to hide it or make it 'transparent' in some fashion? Hmm... "Annotate only the changes that relate to feature X."...
Oh, and a complete AI with that if you don't mind. ;)

But you've probably already thought about all this...

Eli
--------------------. "If it ain't broke now,
Eli Carter \ it will be soon." -- crypto-gram
eli.carter(a)inet.com `-------------------------------------------------

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/