Re: [PATCH] cryptoapi: Fix sleeping
From: James Morris
Date: Thu Aug 14 2003 - 12:13:35 EST
On Thu, 14 Aug 2003, Matt Mackall wrote:
> It's basically trying to be friendly. Since we can't really detect
> when it's safe to do such yields, we should be explicitly flag the
> uses where its ok. Something like this:
I think this is the best approach.
> #define CRYPTO_TFM_MODE_MASK 0x000000ff
> #define CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MASK 0x000fff00
> -#define CRYPTO_TFM_RES_MASK 0xfff00000
> +#define CRYPTO_TFM_RES_MASK 0x7ff00000
> +#define CRYPTO_TFM_API_MASK 0x80000000
This doesn't leave much room for API flags -- the CRYPTO_TFM_REQ_MASK
could be made smaller.
- James
--
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/