Re: [Dri-devel] Re: [PATCH] CodingStyle fixes for drm_agpsupport

[Philip Brown]

On Thu, Aug 14, 2003 at 07:47:11AM -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> ...
> Indeed I have.  And there is a reason that we have a policy at BitMover
> where "formatting changes" are prohibited and we make people redo their
> changesets until they get them right.
> 
> In other words, you are welcome to write a revision control system
> which can look through the formatting changes and give you the semantic
> knowledge that you want.  We'd love to see how it is done and then do
> it in BitKeeper :)


You should allow for changes that are "formatting change only", with no
actual code structural change.
You could pass the results through stage 1 of gcc, and only allow it if the
parsing tree is identical.

I was originally going to suggest just passing it through "indent", but
that would not come out right, if someone added braces to clarify a
one-line conditional.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/