Re: [RFC][PATCH] Make cryptoapi non-optional?

[James Morris]

On Sat, 16 Aug 2003, Matt Mackall wrote:

> Yes, but it's introduced by the requirements imposed by cryptoapi. The
> current code uses the stack (though currently rather a lot of it),
> which lets it be fully re-entrant. Not an option with cryptoapi.

This will be possible with your api flags patch, right?


- James
-- 
James Morris
<jmorris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/