Re: NFS regression in 2.6

From: Trond Myklebust
Date: Wed Aug 20 2003 - 09:37:31 EST


>>>>> " " == Ulrich Drepper <drepper@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> The result is always, 100% of the time, a failure in ftruncate.
> The kernel reports ESTALE. This has not been a problem in 2.4
> and not even in 2.6 until <mumble> months ago. And of course
> it works with local disks.

There are known bugs in the way we handle readdirplus. That's why it
only hits NFSv3. Does the following patch fix it?

Cheers,
Trond

diff -u --recursive --new-file linux-2.6.0-test2/fs/nfs/dir.c linux-2.6.0-test2-fix_cto/fs/nfs/dir.c
--- linux-2.6.0-test2/fs/nfs/dir.c 2003-06-30 07:19:26.000000000 -0700
+++ linux-2.6.0-test2-fix_cto/fs/nfs/dir.c 2003-08-11 07:54:47.000000000 -0700
@@ -557,7 +557,7 @@
/* Force a full look up iff the parent directory has changed */
if (nfs_check_verifier(dir, dentry)) {
if (nfs_lookup_verify_inode(inode, isopen))
- goto out_bad;
+ goto out_zap_parent;
goto out_valid;
}

@@ -566,7 +566,7 @@
if (memcmp(NFS_FH(inode), &fhandle, sizeof(struct nfs_fh))!= 0)
goto out_bad;
if (nfs_lookup_verify_inode(inode, isopen))
- goto out_bad;
+ goto out_zap_parent;
goto out_valid_renew;
}

@@ -587,6 +587,8 @@
unlock_kernel();
dput(parent);
return 1;
+out_zap_parent:
+ nfs_zap_caches(dir);
out_bad:
NFS_CACHEINV(dir);
if (inode && S_ISDIR(inode->i_mode)) {
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/