Re: [PATCH] initramfs + sysfs as root fix

From: H. Peter Anvin
Date: Wed Aug 27 2003 - 19:42:01 EST


Followup to: <200308232157.53962.gkajmowi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
By author: Garrett Kajmowicz <gkajmowi@xxxxxxxxxxx>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> This is my first real patch, so please vet thoroughly
>
> This patch allows a person to not require mounting a root device at startup.
> This works idealy for people trying to use the initramfs/sysfs as the only
> filesystem.
>
> What happens is that when the root device is set to 0,0 mount_root is not
> called. I have tested in VMWare extensively, and the patch is quite minimal.
>
> +++ linux/init/do_mounts.c 2003-08-23 17:22:59.000000000 -0400
> @@ -380,6 +380,12 @@
> if (is_floppy && rd_doload && rd_load_disk(0))
> ROOT_DEV = Root_RAM0;
>
> +#ifndef CONFIG_ROOT_NFS
> + if (MAJOR(ROOT_DEV) == UNNAMED_MAJOR && MINOR(ROOT_DEV) == 0) {
> + goto out;
> + }
> +#endif
> +
> mount_root();

It seems ugly, to say the least, to conditionalize this on
CONFIG_ROOT_NFS. If anything it should be conditionalized on no NFS
root actually configured, which is a very different thing.

(Of course, then nfsroot should be done via initramfs...)

-hpa
--
<hpa@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> at work, <hpa@xxxxxxxxx> in private!
If you send me mail in HTML format I will assume it's spam.
"Unix gives you enough rope to shoot yourself in the foot."
Architectures needed: ia64 m68k mips64 ppc ppc64 s390 s390x sh v850 x86-64
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/