Re: [RFC] extents support for EXT3

[Alex Tomas]

>>>>> Ed Sweetman (ES) writes:

 ES> If it's the same as test2 then i've already tried it.  I got no
 ES> performance gains as far as dbench is concerned.  Perhaps my block
 ES> size is not optimal on that partition for extents.  Either way it
 ES> seemed to make the kernel unstable and i've been trying to fix things
 ES> since mid-day yesterday.  Been getting very strange problems, no error
 ES> messages are reported or anything like that.

I still use -test2, because -test4 detects my scsi hdds in another order
than -test2. last time I sent rediff against -test4. what kind of problem
did you see?

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/