Re: precise characterization of ext3 atomicity

[Andreas Dilger]

On Sep 05, 2003  01:32 +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
> Andreas Dilger wrote:
> >It is possible to do the same with ext3, namely exporting journal_start()
> >and journal_stop() (or some interface to them) to userspace so the application
> >can start a transaction for multiple operations.  We had discussed this in
> >the past, but decided not to do so because user applications can screw up in
> >so many ways, and if an application uses these interfaces it is possible to
> >deadlock the entire filesystem if the application isn't well behaved.
>
> That's why we confine it to a (finite #defined number) set of 
> operations within one sys_reiser4 call.  At some point we will allow 
> trusted user space processes to span multiple system calls (mail server 
> applicances, database appliances, etc., might find this useful).  You 
> might consider supporting sys_reiser4 at some point.

Ah, OK.  If you are confining the atom to a single syscall, then this is
a much easier problem to solve, assuming sys_reiser4() has a sufficiently
rich interface to express what people want to do.  It avoids all of the
potential problems that could arise if you want to keep a transaction
open over multiple syscalls.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
http://sourceforge.net/projects/ext2resize/
http://www-mddsp.enel.ucalgary.ca/People/adilger/

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/