Re: 2.6.0-test4-mm6

From: Zwane Mwaikambo
Date: Fri Sep 05 2003 - 19:16:05 EST


On Fri, 5 Sep 2003, Andrew Morton wrote:

> We didn't get many reports from this in -mm5. I'd prefer to stick with
> Con's patches because they're tweaks, rather than fundamental changes and
> they have had more testing and are more widely understood.
>
> But the performance regressions with specjbb and volanomark are a
> problem. We need to understand this and get it fixed up.

I believe Con has a lead on this already, the thing to find out is why
sched_clock() causes such a regression.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/