Re: 2.6.0-test4-mm5 and below: Wine and XMMS problems

[Adrian Bunk]

On Sun, Sep 07, 2003 at 10:18:27PM +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Sun, 7 Sep 2003 20:08, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 11:18:12PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > >...
> > > . Dropped out Con's CPU scheduler work, added Nick's.  This is to help us
> > >   in evaluating the stability, efficacy and relative performance of
> > > Nick's work.
> > >
> > >   We're looking for feedback on the subjective behaviour and on the usual
> > >   server benchmarks please.
> > >...
> >
> > Short story:
> >
> > I'm still using 2.5.72, all of the 2.6.0-test?{,-mm?} kernels have
> > problems
> 
> What's your X and xmms nice values? Many X servers are reniced to -10 and some 

They have both nice value 0.

> shells spawn new apps at nice 5. After that the most common thing I find in 
> reports are upgrades to newer kernels losing hard disk dma at some stage (due 
> to config changes/movements) and it not being noticed.

DMA is wrking without problems.

> Con

cu
Adrian

-- 

       "Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
        of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
       "Only a promise," Lao Er said.
                                       Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/