Re: Scaling noise

[Stephen Satchell]

At 05:57 PM 9/7/2003 -0700, Larry McVoy wrote:
> That's not "a machine" that's ~1150 machines on a network.  This business
> of describing a bunch of boxes on a network as "a machine" is nonsense.

Then you haven't been keeping up with Open-source projects, or the 
literature.  The development of virtual servers composed of clusters of 
Linux boxes on a private network appears to be a single machine to the 
outside world.  Indeed, a highly scaled Web site using such a cluster is 
indistinguishable from one using a mainframe-class computer (which for the 
past 30 years have been networks of specialized processors working together).

The difference is that the bulk of the nodes are on a private network, not 
on a public one.  Actually, the machines I have seen have been on a weave 
of networks, so that as data traverses the nodes you don't get a bottleneck 
effect.

It's a lot different than the Illiac IV I grew up with...

Satch



--
"People who seem to have had a new idea have often just stopped having an 
old idea." -- Dr. Edwin H. Land  

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/