Re: [PATCH] Minor scheduler fix to get rid of skipping in xmms

[Con Kolivas]

On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:10, Con Kolivas wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Sep 2003 08:56, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > Steven Pratt <slpratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > > For specjbb things are looking good from a throughput point of view.
> > > ...
> > > Volanomark, on the other hand is still off by quite a bit from test4
> > > stock
> >
> > hmm, thanks.
> >
> > I'm not sure that volanomark is very representative of any real-world
> > thing.
> >
> > > ...
> > > If thre is any particular patch/tree combination you would like me to
> > > try out, please let me know and I will see if I can get the results for
> > > you.
> >
> > Could we please see test5 versus test5 plus Andrew's patch?
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.0-test4
> >/2 .6.0-test4-mm6/broken-out/sched-CAN_MIGRATE_TASK-fix.patch
> >
> > and if you have time, also test5 plus sched-CAN_MIGRATE_TASK-fix.patch
> > plus
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.0-test4
> >/2 .6.0-test4-mm6/broken-out/sched-balance-fix-2.6.0-test3-mm3-A0.patch
>
> Interestingly enough this drops the volano results the same proportion as
> Ingo's A3 patch. 11000 ->10400 throughput with same idle, but more
> schedule().
>
> I've posted some results for test5 volano and test5-A0 here:
> http://kernel.kolivas.org/2.5/volano
>
> More testing underway.

Correction sorry: These changes were due to sched-CAN_MIGRATE_TASK-fix.patch 
and the test results say volano-results-2.6.0-test5-A0-*

Con

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/