Steven Pratt <slpratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:No this was test 5 plus sched-CAN_MIGRATE_TASK-fix.patch only. I seems I misread the request. I am running that job now.
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.0-test4/2.6.0-test4-mm6/broken-out/sched-CAN_MIGRATE_TASK-fix.patchThis patch improves specjjb over test5 and has no real effect on any of kernbench, volanomark or specsdet.
Fine, it's a good fix.
and if you have time, also test5 plus sched-CAN_MIGRATE_TASK-fix.patch plusThis patch degrades both specjbb and volanomark, and to a lesser degree specsdet
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.0-test4/2.6.0-test4-mm6/broken-out/sched-balance-fix-2.6.0-test3-mm3-A0.patch
ok. And just confirming: that was test5 plus
sched-CAN_MIGRATE_TASK-fix.patch plus
sched-balance-fix-2.6.0-test3-mm3-A0.patch?
I didn't expect a regression from sched-balance-fix.Ok, this is submitted as well. Should have results this afternoon.
What I'm afraid of is that those patches will yield improved results overI tried adding this patch to stock test5 and it failed to apply cleanly. I have not had a chance to look at why. Did you mean for this to be applied by itself, or was this supposed to go on top of one of the other patches?
test5, and that adding
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.0-test4/2.6.0-test4-mm6/broken-out/sched-2.6.0-test2-mm2-A3.patch
Yes, it applies on top of the other two patches.
Thanks for working on this: it's pretty important right now.