Re: [PATCH] Minor scheduler fix to get rid of skipping in xmms

From: Steven Pratt
Date: Wed Sep 10 2003 - 09:01:38 EST


Andrew Morton wrote:

Steven Pratt <slpratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.0-test4/2.6.0-test4-mm6/broken-out/sched-CAN_MIGRATE_TASK-fix.patch



This patch improves specjjb over test5 and has no real effect on any of kernbench, volanomark or specsdet.



Fine, it's a good fix.



and if you have time, also test5 plus sched-CAN_MIGRATE_TASK-fix.patch plus

ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.0-test4/2.6.0-test4-mm6/broken-out/sched-balance-fix-2.6.0-test3-mm3-A0.patch



This patch degrades both specjbb and volanomark, and to a lesser degree specsdet



ok. And just confirming: that was test5 plus
sched-CAN_MIGRATE_TASK-fix.patch plus
sched-balance-fix-2.6.0-test3-mm3-A0.patch?


No this was test 5 plus sched-CAN_MIGRATE_TASK-fix.patch only. I seems I misread the request. I am running that job now.

I didn't expect a regression from sched-balance-fix.



What I'm afraid of is that those patches will yield improved results over
test5, and that adding

ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.0-test4/2.6.0-test4-mm6/broken-out/sched-2.6.0-test2-mm2-A3.patch



I tried adding this patch to stock test5 and it failed to apply cleanly. I have not had a chance to look at why. Did you mean for this to be applied by itself, or was this supposed to go on top of one of the other patches?



Yes, it applies on top of the other two patches.

Thanks for working on this: it's pretty important right now.

Ok, this is submitted as well. Should have results this afternoon.

Steve



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/